Re: [papercreters] Look at the size of storage field that would be required

This is a commercial adobe block setup and is hardly what an average papercreter would have to dry blocks to build something with. I have not found the drying of and handling of blocks to be that big of an issue. It would seem that a lot of people who get interested in papercrete are turned off by the prospect of taking a little time and having some patience in the building process. This, in my humble estimation, is part of the beauty of papercrete. If we are looking for instant gratification, then I suppose one could take on a big mortgage and buy a subdivision house and live happily ever after, or at least until the foreclosure comes to pass. --- On Sat, 4/10/10, countryatheartok <criswells.ok@sbcglobal.net> wrote: From: countryatheartok <criswells.ok@sbcglobal.net> Subject: [papercreters] Look at the size of storage field that would be required To: papercreters@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, April 10, 2010, 4:07 PM   Although this is not papercrete, the process to store block would be the same. This is why I have chosen the T lock system, just let them dry in the wall instead of that hugh field. http://www.nmbuilde r.com/nmearth. html Also when these are laid up they look much the same as papercrete. http://www.nmbuilde r.com/moreadobe. html

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___