I think that if you are not filling in, then it is not infill. Whether the structure is done before or after the pc should not make a difference, so maybe that should be restated as non-structural areas that are associated with a structural framework that supports the roof. Which is done first should be irrelevant.
Why would this not be the place to discuss your idea? I'd like to hear more about a new technique that you want to try.
Spaceman
ElfNori wrote:
__._,_.___I'd like to see nothing in the code about the structural part being put in place first. I have something I want to try that puts the structural frame in place after the infill is in place . . . This probably isn't the best place to discuss it, but your post brought that concern to the forefront of my mind.ElfN----- Original Message -----From: SpacemanSent: Friday, August 24, 2007 7:08 AMSubject: Re: [papercreters] Code Team Initial Goal
In this context, I believe that infill would be defined as non-structural. A framework that supports the roof is in place, and then the pc is used to fill in the gaps both as insulation and to keep out the weather. This could be blocks, panels, tiltup, sprayed on, or slipformed.
Once this first goal is accomplished then we will move on to structural pc.
And yes, it should be defined in our statement, as should all terms. We need someone like you to help with technical details like this. Please join us tomorrow with your valuable ideas.
Spaceman
Neal Chabot wrote:Should not "infill" be defined somewhere in your statement?
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.4/969 - Release Date: 8/23/2007 4:04 PM
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
