It is not environmentally friendly at those rates. And it is darned expensive, no cost savings at all. I don't know anyone else that uses portland at those rates. The original houses were only 10% portland. They had on drawback, if a fire started, they would smoulder until put out completely and it could dissolve an entire house. There is absolutely no need to go that heavy on the portland, it is ridiculous, but to each their own.
Cost of portland is a little more than $8, and say the rest is almost free.
Works out to around $1 per cubic foot, not unlike a concrete block.
Maybe I'm a little slow this morning, but where is the savings ?
Or is the main draw that it's "environmentally friendly" ?
TASHA
That is about eight cubic feet dry. Sent from my iPad ------------------------------------ Posted by: clydetcurry@yahoo.com ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ Yahoo Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/papercreters/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/papercreters/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: papercreters-digest@yahoogroups.com papercreters-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: papercreters-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to: https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/ .
-- PK
 | This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com |
__._,_.___
