The article body does not say that flyash is more radioactive than
nuclear waste!! I
It says THAT FOR PEOPLE LIVING AROUND A POWER PLANT, exposure to
radiation from flyash in CoalPlant stack emissions is greater for
that group of near the plant folks than exposure to stray radiation
that manages to pass through the walls of a NuclearPlant is for folks
living close to a nuclear plant.
Two way different conclusions.
--- In papercreters@yahoogroups.com, "spaceman01of99" <Spaceman@...>
wrote:
>
> nurl.us/7nb
>
> Scientific American says that coal ash (fly ash) is more radioactive
> than nuclear waste. Food for thought...
>
> Spaceman
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/papercreters/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/papercreters/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:papercreters-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:papercreters-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
papercreters-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
